DeRosa vs. CAC Financial Corp.

DeRosa vs. CAC Financial Corp. (Eastern District, New York – September 29, 2017) – Case No. 16-cv-0142.
The consumer law firm Barshay Sanders brought a “reverse-Avila” claim against our client alleging it violated the FDCPA by failing to indicate whether the amount due would or would not change. Judge Leonard Wexler granted our Motion for Summary Judgment rejecting Plaintiff’s argument the Second Circuit’s decision in Avila required our client to indicate the debt was static and therefore, would not change.

Read Full Order

Menu